Linux can provide a fast, secure, and modern desktop computing experience. However, Bluetooth audio on Linux sucks.
Bluetooth audio cuts out intermittently
If you experience 1 second gaps of silence approximately every 300 seconds of Bluetooth audio playback, this post may help you.
Try adding this line to the /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf file
sudo su cd /etc/modprobe.d nano alsa-base.conf
add this line:
options snd-hda-intel model=generic
save and exit reboot
Can you use a wire instead?
A dear friend, of the same generation that refers to “Walkman jacks,” first helped solve this problem for audio at work from my personal laptop: by gifting a sound bar that can plug into an actual 1/8″ analog audio headphone jack.
(My friend also sent a USB-C plug to 1/8″ analog audio jack adapter, which I do not yet need, but have packed into my accessories bag, for use in the near future, when my next laptop will have even fewer ports.)
No Bluetooth microphone support for Linux
There are technical and historical reasons for why there is no Linux driver support for Bluetooth microphones. My suggestion is to invest in a wired USB headset. Logitech is a safe choice.
There are several ways to experiment with Linux as a desktop operating system without making a full commitment to re-formatting your laptop, or giving up access to Windows. This post aims to provide ideas and a roadmap for a current Windows consumer considering a switch to desktop Linux, but unsure how or where to start.
There are many distributions of desktop Linux. I suggest you start with Ubuntu or Fedora.
Running Linux as a live desktop boot on a USB stick
The live version of Linux on a USB stick is useful to test the hardware on your laptop, and to get an idea of how a Linux distribution feels hands-on. The interface on Mint, for example, is quite different from the Gnome 3 desktop experience on Fedora and Ubuntu.
An example: the boot screen of a “live” distribution of Ubuntu. If you click “Try Ubuntu” the operating system will run using the USB stick as its storage.
The live version of Linux on a USB stick is impractical for day-to-day use.
(If your laptop’s SATA controller is configured for RAID mode, you will still be able to boot the live operating system from the Linux installer on a USB stick. However, you will not be able to read files on the Windows hard drive, or install Linux to the hard drive. See below for more details regarding SATA drive controllers, RAID mode, and AHCI mode.)
Running Linux as a virtual machine (VM) guest under VMware Workstation Player Free for Windows
VMware Workstation Player Free for Windows is proprietary software, but is available free of charge for personal, non-commercial use. This software offers good performance and a smooth experience.
On average, people upgrade their personal laptop every 5 years. If you buy a new laptop, consider backing up your old laptop, then reformatting the old laptop with Linux. The old machine will get a new lease on life: Linux will run faster than Windows on the same hardware. This approach allows you to experiment with Linux without committing yourself.
Checking the SATA drive controller mode in BIOS: RAID vs AHCI
(Warning: Windows partition will be unusable after changing SATA mode to AHCI, do your backup first!)
If you intend to format a computer with Linux, you need to go into the BIOS and change the SATA drive controller from RAID mode to AHCI mode.
Go into the BIOS of the laptop by pressing F2 during bootup, and change the SATA controller mode from RAID to AHCI.
Many howtos on creating multiple-boot between Windows and Linux are now obsolete
Many of the existing howtos describing how to create a multiple-boot between Windows and Linux are now obsolete. In the past 3 years, laptop motherboards have been shipping with the SATA hard drive controller set by default to RAID instead of AHCI. Changing the SATA controller mode from RAID to AHCI renders an existing Windows installation unusable. These howtos rely on resizing an existing Windows partition to create unallocated space for a Linux install. There is, however, little point in preserving a broken Windows installation.
Formatting a computer with Windows and Linux in dual-boot mode
It is possible to install Windows and Linux in a multiple-boot configuration. However this requires backing up the unique data (documents and other unique files) from the existing Windows installation, changing the SATA controller mode, doing a fresh baremetal Windows install on part of the drive space, and doing a fresh baremetal install of Linux on another part of the drive space.
Checking whether a system is set for UEFI or Legacy/BIOS mode
Check the laptop’s BIOS to determine whether the system is set for UEFI or Legacy/BIOS mode. If the system is in Legacy/BIOS mode, change the setting to UEFI mode. This will be needed later, when the Linux installer creates a multiple-boot menu using grub2.
My brother hosts his personal website and blog malak.ca on a baremetal DSL server. My brother uses Fedora on his laptop and server.
A perfectly good pre-fork mod_php MPM-ITK PHP handler was in place, and serving web pages.
Upon reboot after the major version upgrade, the web server was showing error 503 for PHP requests on the blog. The config files were a mismatched mess, so we ended up having to do a baremetal format. My brother keeps his data on a separate drive so the baremetal evac only involved a mysql dump file and a few config files, but still.
Note this post about Fedora 33: “Several relatively controversial changes are currently under discussion on the project’s mailing lists…”
doesn’t matter, there’s absolutely no reason to take away the
sysadmin’s choice here. There are at least 40 servers I personally am
responsible for where I see no reason to move from mod_php to
php-fpm, for example.” John M. Harris Jr.
I was a CentOS web server admin for many years, and used Fedora on my personal laptop until last year. My brother ran CentOS in the past, but towards the end of the Long Term Support (LTS) cycle, CentOS had absurdly outdated but security-patched versions of libraries. My brother started using Fedora on his web server, and we have been able to do several major version upgrades without incident. The reliability of this upgrade process is what made Fedora suitable for a web server.
Ubuntu has trouble
with major version upgrades. On some Ubuntu version upgrades, the
installer freezes, requiring that a rescue kernel be entered, apt-get
update –fix-missing, dpkg –repair, and other exotic interventions
take place before the upgrade process can be resumed and completed.
By comparison, Fedora version upgrading has a better track record, and is usually smooth. A technical error or unforeseen incompatibility would be understandable. A deliberate policy choice to break production web servers to enforce a policy opinion: not cool.